[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: jakarta-commons-dev
Subject: svn commit: r607581 - /commons/proper/commons-build/trunk/xdocs/patches.xml
From: rahul () apache ! org
Date: 2007-12-30 19:16:51
Message-ID: 20071230191651.9ED821A9838 () eris ! apache ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
Author: rahul
Date: Sun Dec 30 11:16:49 2007
New Revision: 607581
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=607581&view=rev
Log:
Remove Jakarta references and other improvements. Reported by Roland Weber <ossfwot \
AT dubioso DOT net>.
Modified:
commons/proper/commons-build/trunk/xdocs/patches.xml
Modified: commons/proper/commons-build/trunk/xdocs/patches.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/commons-build/trunk/xdocs/patches.xml?rev=607581&r1=607580&r2=607581&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- commons/proper/commons-build/trunk/xdocs/patches.xml (original)
+++ commons/proper/commons-build/trunk/xdocs/patches.xml Sun Dec 30 11:16:49 2007
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
<body>
<section name="On Contributing Patches">
<p>
- The commons gets a fair number of submissions from developers new to jakarta.
- A lot of information to help you do this exists around jakarta but it can be hard \
to find. + The commons gets a fair number of submissions from developers new to \
contributing patches. + A lot of information to help you do this exists, but it can \
be hard to find. This document gathers up material about patches into one handy \
reference. </p>
<p>
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@
</li>
<li>
By mailing the patch as an attachment to the
- <a href='http://commons.apache.org/mail-lists.html'>appropriate dev mailing \
list</a>. + <a href='http://commons.apache.org/mail-lists.html'>dev mailing \
list</a>.
The email subject should describe what the patch does and should be prefixed \
by <code>[PATCH]</code>. Make sure that it's clear which component the patch \
is for.
Ideally the component name should be the next word after \
<code>[PATCH]</code>. @@ -120,13 +120,14 @@
</ul>
</p>
<p>
- <em>But which way is better?</em> They are both equally acceptable!
+ <em>But which way is better?</em> Please use JIRA, patches sent to the mailing \
lists are + hard to track unless they are immediately acted upon!
</p>
<p>If it's a big patch
then adding it to a bug report will save bandwidth on the mailing list (but \
remember to include the url in any follow-up discussions). Using a bug report also \
allows you to be automatically posted with status updates. Note that new bug \
reports (and comments on
- existing ones) automatically get mailed to the commons-dev email list so there's \
no + existing ones) automatically get mailed to the issues email list so there's no
need to post a separate email indicating that the patch has been created.
</p>
<p>
@@ -135,7 +136,7 @@
developers out there wasting their time by developing independent fixes!
</p>
<p>
- If there has already been discussion of the issue on the dev mailing list (but no \
bugzilla + If there has already been discussion of the issue on the dev mailing list \
(but no JIRA entry has been created), then posting the patch direct to the mailing \
list can be simpler. </p>
<p>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic