[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       jakarta-commons-dev
Subject:    Re: [configuration] request for comments on refactoring
From:       Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg () micropole-univers ! com>
Date:       2004-05-19 9:30:38
Message-ID: 200405190934.LAA01270 () vertigo ! micropole ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Brent Verner wrote:

> After looking at [vfs], I'm not sure which parts of it would be
> used to implement the key/value nature of a Configuration; maybe
> only the setAttribute/getAttribute bits?
> 
> In any case, I'm gonna finish my originally planned refactoring 
> and then we can discuss what else should be refactored before
> calling this round of refactoring complete.  We can always decide
> to refactor the ConfigurationProvider impls to use [vfs] at a later
> date if there appears to be a positive return on the effort.

Yes the idea is to use [vfs] to retrieve the configuration file, not to 
parse it.

Emmanuel Bourg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]