[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       jabber-jdev
Subject:    Re: [JDEV] conference room creation
From:       "Rob Davis" <lists () solarismedia ! co ! uk>
Date:       2002-11-27 23:46:20
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Van

Thanks!

I added the following at the start of the returned form as you
suggested:

<field type="hidden" var="form"><value>config</value></field>

and it responded to the subsequent field value (room name) but, it
seems, not the rest of the several selected fields.

So it does look as if one needs to return the complete form, or possibly
the correct fields in sequence as far as the last field one wants to
alter...

(I was hoping for a shortcut!)

Rob


----- Original Message -----
From: "Van Gale" <vangale@fastmail.fm>
To: <jdev@jabber.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: [JDEV] conference room creation


> On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:06:25 -0000, "Rob Davis"
> <lists@solarismedia.co.uk> said:
> >
> > I am however assuming that:
> >
> > * MUC doesn't require the complete configuration form back; only the
> > fields to change
>
> This assumption may not be correct.  I haven't tried sending back
partial
> forms, but...
>
> > Any clues?
>
> Our client developer had a similar problem that we tracked down to him
> not returning a hidden field named "config".  (I think that was the
field
> name... just going from memory here).
>
> So, I'm unsure whether sending partial form will work or not, but you
> certainly need to include the hidden field regardless.
>
> --
>   Van Gale
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> jdev@jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev


_______________________________________________
jdev mailing list
jdev@jabber.org
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]