[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ispman-users
Subject:    Re: [Ispman-users] ISPMan and mod_vhs
From:       Andreas John <aj () net-lab ! net>
Date:       2005-03-05 17:41:09
Message-ID: 4229EF35.3080903 () net-lab ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Hello Scott,
hello Atif,

We are using vhost_alias for a couple of years now without ispman.
Gernerally it's fine stuff, but it's no longer under development AFAIK.

As Atif stated: You also lose some flexibilty -> that's why we are 
moving from vhsot_alias to ispman :)

Cons:
- no Errlog per vhost possible (ask the Apache people why. Errorlogs are 
free-form text, i .e. it's not possible to insert "vhost" in the first 
column)
- accesslog per vhost only with external stuff (like a vlogger, in out 
case slightly patched) [1]
- no suexec per vhost
(I mean - vhost in a sende of ispman calls it - it's possible to set 
"user" and "group" in <virtualhost> but only one user per directive, not 
per "sub-host)
- suphp works (because it looks for the file's owner. BTW: Is there 
something similar for cgi too??)

It would be also possible to model the vhost_alias functions via 
mod_rewrite [2]

IMO it's would be a smart solution to work on vhost_alias, to patch in 
workarounds for the problems mentioned above.

And more ideas? Criticism welcome ;)

rgds,
Andreas

[1] http://n0rp.chemlab.org/vlogger/
[2] http://people.debian.org/~dexter/apacheconf/




-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Ispman-users mailing list
Ispman-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]