[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: isp-bgp
Subject: Re: Static IP address Vs DHCP
From: Rob Genovesi <rob () coastside ! net>
Date: 2001-10-22 17:52:05
[Download RAW message or body]
So you would be updated all of your DNS every three days when your ip
addresses changed? Even if this was scripted to happen automatically you
would still have propogation issues wouldn't you? You'd have to keep your
TTL set really low on all your records to avoid problems, and even then I
think there are a lot of DNS servers out there that have their own
timetables for caching records. Also your DNS servers themselves would
have to be somewhere with static addressing.
IMO, It would be well worth a little extra $$ to get perm. static IPs.
Is there something I am missing here?
-Rob
> > Folks,
> > I am intending to get a static IP address to satisfy my need for DNS
> > configuration. The good news is that I can get 3 IP addresses for
> > CHEAP from AT&T. They are DHCP addresses, but their DHCP lease is for 3
> > days. In other words, as long as I don't power down for longer than 3
> > days,I keep the same IP address.
> > Now, even though I am not willing to shut down my mail server (only for
> > maintenance of course), my concern is that, would this meet my need for
>DNS?
> > Could it be used for web hosting, (my main objective)?
> > Please advice.
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> > -MO
> >
_______________ The ISP-BGP Discussion List ______________
To Join: mailto:join-isp-bgp@isp-bgp.com
To Remove: mailto:remove-isp-bgp@isp-bgp.com
Archives: http://isp-lists.isp-planet.com/isp-bgp/archives/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic