[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       iptraf-ng
Subject:    Re: ncurses6
From:       Jan Engelhardt <jengelh () inai ! de>
Date:       2013-03-28 21:36:14
Message-ID: alpine.LNX.2.01.1303282234360.12432 () nerf07 ! vanv ! qr
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 2013-03-28 21:10, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:

>Hello Jan,
>
>Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de> writes:
>
>> The following changes since commit 8143dabb91939f8731853981528a7cdc460768a1:
>>
>>   iptraf.c: fix displaying long interface names (2012-11-28 10:20:30 +0100)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>>   git://git.inai.de/iptraf master
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to ed6b73679dac063ef91c96e21aef26ca06e990b5:
>>
>>   build: prefer ncurses6 and wide (2013-03-28 20:56:11 +0100)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Jan Engelhardt (1):
>>       build: prefer ncurses6 and wide
>>
>>  Makefile | 18 +++++++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
>
>is there any good reason to prefer ncurses6?

Is there any good reason to prefer ncurses5?

(nc6 has less collisions in the symbol namespace.. and the WIDE variant 
has, on occassion, in the past, been the only one to render line-drawing 
graphics correctly.)
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]