[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ipsec
Subject:    Re: IPSEC and NAT
From:       Tim Bass (IETF) <ietf () linux ! silkroad ! com>
Date:       1997-08-20 10:27:28
[Download RAW message or body]


After following this thread with great interest, it appears that IPSEC
has marginalized NAT.  If this in indeed the case, this is 'not a good
thing', IHMO.  NAT is an important 'fact of life' which need to be
considered as a requirement which IPSEC should embrace.

Could someone explain why NAT appears to be out of the IPSEC requirements
radar screen?

Thanks,

Tim

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Tim Bass                           | #include<campfire.h>                | 
| Technical Director                 |       for(beer=100;beer>1;beer++){  |
| SAIC                               |           take_one_down();          |
| Center for Information Protection  |           pass_it_around();         |
|                                    |       }                             |
|                                    |  back_ to_work(); /*never reached */| 
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]