[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ipsec
Subject:    Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis
From:       "Waltermire, David A. (Fed)" <david.waltermire () nist ! gov>
Date:       2017-02-27 21:04:18
Message-ID: MWHPR09MB14400E47792E7F316E775FAEF0570 () MWHPR09MB1440 ! namprd09 ! prod ! outlook ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Thanks Paul!

Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IPsec [mailto:ipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kathleen Moriarty
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 3:55 PM
> To: paul@nohats.ca
> Cc: ipsec@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis@ietf.org; Tero Kivinen
> <kivinen@iki.fi>
> Subject: Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis
> 
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
> >
> >>> I think that may help head off questions in last call and IESG
> >>> review if anyone else looks back at 7321.
> >>
> >>
> >> Is there any chance this update could happen today so I can start
> >> last call?  I'd like ot keep this on the 3/16 telechat with the other
> >> IPsecme draft if possible.
> >
> >
> > Yes, I'll push out an update today that includes what Tero and I said
> > to replace that one liner you pointed at.
> 
> Great, thank you!
> >
> > Paul
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Best regards,
> Kathleen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]