'Re: [IPsec] P-256 speed'

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ipsec
Subject:    Re: [IPsec] P-256 speed
From:       Stephen Kent <kent () bbn ! com>
Date:       2015-08-10 20:08:59
Message-ID: 55C904DB.2050901 () bbn ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]

Yoav,

> Is this code available anywhere? If not, it makes it hard to reproduce 
> their results.
There is a paper on the code design, and I anticipate the code will 
become available,
as the work was sponsored by NIST.
> It's too bad they don't submit this to bench.cr.yp.to so we could have 
> an apples-to-apples comparison with other implementations.
I suspect they will do so.

Steve

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Yoav,<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:699D4CBB-8302-43E8-AD0D-A47A80A5066B@gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      Is this code available anywhere? If not, it makes it hard to
      reproduce their results.<br>
    </blockquote>
    There is a paper on the code design, and I anticipate the code will
    become available,<br>
    as the work was sponsored by NIST.
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:699D4CBB-8302-43E8-AD0D-A47A80A5066B@gmail.com"
      type="cite">It's too bad they don't submit this to bench.cr.yp.to
      so we could have an apples-to-apples comparison with other
      implementations.<br>
    </blockquote>
    I suspect they will do so.<br>
    <br>
    Steve<br>
  </body>
</html>

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 