[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ipsec
Subject:    Re: [IPsec] [rohc] Comments on current RoHC over IPSec draft
From:       "Carl Knutsson" <carlknut () gmail ! com>
Date:       2008-09-30 12:38:50
Message-ID: 895583cb0809300538s2cbef95cy6c064f026c0c4e7 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Chris, Emre,

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Christou, Christos [USA]
<christou_chris@bah.com> wrote:

-----8<---------
> As you have pointed out, the overhead varies based on profiles. Although
> it might not be as ideal, the overhead we would account for PMTU could
> be profile dependent. In other words, there will be an entry in the SPD
> for the profiles we would like to compress over particular SA's.
> Therefore, depending on the profiles identified, we could account for
> the maximum possible RoHC overhead in the PMTU calculation based on the
> profiles listed in the SPD.
>
agreed

> We will not include the MAX_HEADER parameter in our drafts.
>
agreed

/Calle
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]