[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ipsec
Subject:    Re: Meta-comment: use of "red" / "black" terminology...
From:       "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso () mit ! edu>
Date:       2003-11-25 18:10:42
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:50:03AM -0500, Stephen Kent wrote:
> I think we have to pick a pair of terms and realize that they will 
> not always be perfectly descriptive in all contexts.
> 
> Rich Graveman, in a message to me yesterday, noted that the ATM forum 
> folks use "protected" and "unprotected" to describe the sides of the 
> ATM crypto boundary in their documents. So, barring any better 
> suggestions, we will use those terms going forward.

Thanks, I think these would be a better set of terms going forward, in
particular with respect to issue #91.

						- Ted

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]