[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: ipng
Subject: Questionnaire
From: "Ian Nice4" <ian.nice4 () ntlworld ! com>
Date: 2001-01-23 20:25:48
[Download RAW message or body]
QuestionnaireI am a student from Cheltenham and Gloucester College of HE and am \
currently in the last year of my degree with honours in computing. I am studying when \
IPV6 will be introduced and some of the issues surrounding the implementation for my \
dissertation. This project will involve 20% of my final year mark, and I am hoping \
you would spend 10 minutes filling out the following questionnaire to aid me in my \
study. Any replies you give will be gratefully received. I have sent this \
questionnaire in HTML format so if you can only see a jumbled mass of code or you \
cannot see a submit button at the bottom please navigate to \
http://mmprj01.chelt.ac.uk/upload/mainngtrans.htm. Please pass this e-mail on to all \
relevant contacts or departments.
Please spare a few minutes of your time filling out this questionnaire.
Many Thanks, Ian Nice C&GCHE
Name: E-mail Address:
Organisation: Job Title:
Q1, When do you think IPV6 will finally be ratified as a standard?
5 years or longer 4 to 5 years
3 to 4 years 2 to 3 years
up to 2 years
Q2, Are you aware of the progress of hardware developments for IPV6 implementation?
Yes No
If you answered 'yes' to question 2 please continue to question 3 otherwise please \
proceed to question 4
Q3, how close are we to being ready?
5 years or longer 4 to 5 years
3 to 4 years 2 to 3 years
up to 2 years
Please comment further on the types of technology.
Q4, Are you aware of the progress of software developments for IPV6 implementation?
Yes No
If you answered 'yes' to question 4 please continue to question 5 otherwise please \
proceed to question 6
Q5, how close are we to being ready?
5 years or longer 4 to 5 years
3 to 4 years 2 to 3 years
up to 2 years
Please comment futher on the types of technology.
Q6, Chris Lee in a recent article in IT Week (8th Jan 2001) entitled 'ITU draws up 3G \
roadmap' quoted that some 3G [mobile phone service that will use IPV6] "...should be \
available in the first half of 2002.". As members of IPNGWG are you happy that IPV6 \
infrastructure devices will be available to support these devices by this time?
Q7, In the same article Chris Lee quotes analysis firm 'Analysys' predicting "...3G \
services will have 480 million subscribers worldwide by 2006." Do you think that the \
introduction of the IPV6 dependant technology might clear up the issue of motivation \
to upgrade? As Chris Lewis put it in 'Cisco TCP/IP Routing Professional Reference' \
"For most private networks, the benefits of upgrading are not yet clear" Would you \
like to comment on this?
Q8, In you view, what will be the motivation for ISP's and organisations to change \
fully functional IPV4 implementations?
Q9,Are you aware of new technologies that demand features of IPV6 that IPV4 does not \
offer?
Q10, Are you aware of any new technologies that are IPV6 enabled only?
Q11, Do you have any further comments you wish to make?
Q12, If I have any question regarding your replies may I contact you again?
Yes
No
Q13, Would you like to receive a copy of the finished report?
Yes
No
[Attachment #3 (text/html)]
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Questionnaire</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4134.100" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>I am a student from Cheltenham and Gloucester College of
HE and am currently in the last year of my degree with honours in computing. I
am studying when IPV6 will be introduced and some of the issues surrounding the
implementation for my dissertation. This project will involve 20% of my final
year mark, and I am hoping you would spend 10 minutes filling out the following
questionnaire to aid me in my study. Any replies you give will be gratefully
received. I have sent this questionnaire in HTML format so if you can only see a
jumbled mass of code or you cannot see a submit button at the bottom please
navigate to http://mmprj01.chelt.ac.uk/upload/mainngtrans.htm. Please pass this
e-mail on to all relevant contacts or departments.<BR>
<H3>Please spare a few minutes of your time filling out this
questionnaire.</H3><BR>Many Thanks, Ian Nice C&GCHE
<P>
<FORM action=http://mmprj01.chelt.ac.uk/cgi-bin/collect2.pl method=post>
<TABLE width="80%">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><B>Name: </B></TD>
<TD><INPUT name=name></TD>
<TD><B>E-mail Address: </B></TD>
<TD><INPUT name=email></TD></TR>
<P>
<TR>
<TD><B>Organisation: </B></TD>
<TD><INPUT name=org></TD>
<TD><B>Job Title: </B></TD>
<TD><INPUT name=title></TD></TR></P></TBODY></TABLE>
<P><B>Q1, When do you think IPV6 will finally be ratified as a standard?
</B><BR>
<TABLE width="80%">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value="5 years or longer" name=Q1>5 years or
longer</TD>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value="4 to 5 years" name=Q1>4 to 5 years</TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value="3 to 4 years " name=Q1>3 to 4 years</TD>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value="2 to 3 years" name=Q1>2 to 3 years</TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value="up to 2 years" name=Q1>up to 2
years</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<P><B>Q2, Are you aware of the progress of hardware developments for IPV6
implementation?</B><BR>
<TABLE width="80%">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value=Yes name=Q2>Yes</TD>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value=No name=Q2>No</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR>If you
answered 'yes' to question 2 please continue to question 3 otherwise please
proceed to question 4
<P><B>Q3, how close are we to being ready? </B><BR>
<TABLE width="80%">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value="5 years or longer" name=Q3>5 years or
longer</TD>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value="4 to 5 years" name=Q3>4 to 5 years</TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value="3 to 4 years " name=Q3>3 to 4 years</TD>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value="2 to 3 years" name=Q3>2 to 3 years</TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value="up to 2 years" name=Q3>up to 2
years</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR><B>Please comment further on the types of
technology.</B><BR><TEXTAREA name=Q3a rows=5 cols=60></TEXTAREA>
<P><B>Q4, Are you aware of the progress of software developments for IPV6
implementation?</B><BR>
<TABLE width="80%">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value=Yes name=Q4>Yes</TD>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value=No name=Q4>No</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR>If you
answered 'yes' to question 4 please continue to question 5 otherwise please
proceed to question 6
<P><B>Q5, how close are we to being ready? </B><BR>
<TABLE width="80%">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value="5 years or longer" name=Q5>5 years or
longer</TD>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value="4 to 5 years" name=Q5>4 to 5 years</TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value="3 to 4 years " name=Q5>3 to 4 years</TD>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value="2 to 3 years" name=Q5>2 to 3 years</TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value="up to 2 years" name=Q5>up to 2
years</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR><B>Please comment futher on the types of
technology.</B><BR><TEXTAREA name=Q5a rows=5 cols=60></TEXTAREA>
<P><B>Q6, Chris Lee in a recent article in IT Week (8th Jan 2001) entitled 'ITU
draws up 3G roadmap' quoted that some 3G [mobile phone service that will use
IPV6] "...should be available in the first half of 2002.". As members of IPNGWG
are you happy that IPV6 infrastructure devices will be available to support
these devices by this time?</B><BR><TEXTAREA name=Q6 rows=5 cols=60></TEXTAREA>
<P><B>Q7, In the same article Chris Lee quotes analysis firm 'Analysys'
predicting "...3G services will have 480 million subscribers worldwide by 2006."
Do you think that the introduction of the IPV6 dependant technology might clear
up the issue of motivation to upgrade? As Chris Lewis put it in 'Cisco TCP/IP
Routing Professional Reference' "For most private networks, the benefits of
upgrading are not yet clear" Would you like to comment on this?</B><BR><TEXTAREA \
name=Q7 rows=5 cols=60></TEXTAREA> <P><B>Q8, In you view, what will be the \
motivation for ISP's and organisations to change fully functional IPV4 \
implementations?</B><BR><TEXTAREA name=Q8 rows=5 cols=60></TEXTAREA> <P><B>Q9,Are \
you aware of new technologies that demand features of IPV6 that IPV4 does not \
offer?</B><BR><TEXTAREA name=Q9 rows=5 cols=60></TEXTAREA> <P><B>Q10, Are you aware \
of any new technologies that are IPV6 enabled only?</B><BR><TEXTAREA name=Q10 rows=5 \
cols=60></TEXTAREA> <P><B>Q11, Do you have any further comments you wish to \
make?</B><BR><TEXTAREA name=Q11 rows=5 cols=60></TEXTAREA> <P><B>Q12, If I have any \
question regarding your replies may I contact you again?</B><BR>
<TABLE width="80%">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value=Yes name=Q12>Yes</TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value=No name=Q12>No</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<P><B>Q13, Would you like to receive a copy of the finished report?</B><BR>
<TABLE width="80%">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value=Yes name=Q13>Yes</TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><INPUT type=radio value=No name=Q13>No</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><INPUT \
type=submit value=Submit> </FORM></P></BODY></HTML>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic