[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ipng
Subject:    (IPng 4952) Re: ECN - one bit or two?
From:       bound () zk3 ! dec ! com
Date:       1997-11-23 17:43:10
[Download RAW message or body]


>CONCLUSION:

>My conclusion would be that the two-bit approach is more robust
>than the one-bit approach.  As far as I know, there is consensus that
>the two-bit approach is viable;  I don't know that there is rough
>consensus that the one-bit approach is viable.

I conncur with this after your mail.  Implementations also I believe
have a better chance of implementing this and having it work with two
bits.

thanks
/jim

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]