Out of curiousity, does it appear that the 'class' semantics
outlined in draft-ietf-ipngwg-ipv6-spec-v2-00.txt will be
adopted?

I missed this session in Munich and would like to understand if
there is consensus to adopt this specific filed semantics, adopt
all of the changes in the draft, or adopt portions of the draft
to update RFC1883 ad hoc.

Thanks,

- paul

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------