[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ipng
Subject:    Re: [IPv6] [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-templin-intarea-ipid-ext-00.txt
From:       Chris Box <chris.box.ietf () gmail ! com>
Date:       2023-07-29 17:50:38
Message-ID: CACJ6M14THZbe7gg9ey-Xq8aF-m=e3RitR7G7G1Mhx+rG2YOVBA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 at 16:43, touch@strayalpha.com <touch@strayalpha.com>
wrote:

> Hi, Fred (et al.),
>
> It might be useful to be clear whether this option MUST NOT be used on
> atomic datagrams (i.e., where IPv4 DF==1 or when not source fragmented) and
> that it cannot be used for purposes other than reassembly (as the regular
> ID is per RFC 6484).
>

Hi all

This draft is being discussed across three different lists - intarea, ipv6
and the IETF list. As the latter list is for general topics only [1], I am
removing it from the thread. Please continue to discuss on the intarea
list, and if appropriate ipv6. A simple 'reply all' should now achieve this.

Thanks,
Chris Box on behalf of the Moderators team for ietf@ietf.org

[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9245.html

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 at 16:43, <a \
href="mailto:touch@strayalpha.com">touch@strayalpha.com</a> &lt;<a \
href="mailto:touch@strayalpha.com">touch@strayalpha.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><div \
class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px \
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div>Hi, Fred (et \
al.),<div><br></div><div>It might be useful to be clear whether this option MUST NOT \
be used on atomic datagrams (i.e., where IPv4 DF==1 or when not source fragmented) \
and that it cannot be used for purposes other than reassembly (as the regular ID is \
per RFC 6484).</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Hi \
all</div><div><br></div><div>This draft is being discussed across three different \
lists - intarea, ipv6 and the IETF list. As the latter list is for general topics \
only [1], I am removing it from the thread. Please continue to discuss on the intarea \
list, and if appropriate ipv6. A simple &#39;reply all&#39; should now achieve \
this.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Chris Box on behalf of the \
Moderators team for <a \
href="mailto:ietf@ietf.org">ietf@ietf.org</a></div><div><br></div><div>[1]  <a \
href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9245.html">https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9245.html</a></div></div></div>




--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]