[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ipng
Subject:    Re: Flash renumbering
From:       Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan () go6 ! si>
Date:       2020-12-10 9:15:17
Message-ID: f6c275bb-bd16-f00a-0c97-1b92f0bf9bd9 () go6 ! si
[Download RAW message or body]

On 17/09/2020 10:05, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote on 16/09/2020 23:44:
>> This problem is so real in deployments where operators decided to go 
>> with non-persistent IPv6 prefix delegations that we documented it in 
>> RIPE-690 where we suggest to deploy prefix delegations as 
>> persistent/static as possible so networks/hosts behind CPEs don't 
>> suffer from this issue.
> 
> You mean to have the ISPs to provide persistent state so that SLAAC can 
> handle things better?   Only half joking here :-)

What you say - that actually sums it up quite nicely :)

"Dear ISP, please make your network topology as static as possible so 
SLAAC (in current shape and form) doesn't break end-users connectivity 
in some quite interesting ways..."

:)

Cheers, Jan

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]