[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ipng
Subject:    Re: Terry Manderson's Yes on draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-address-generation-privacy-07: (with COMMENT)
From:       Barry Leiba <barryleiba () computer ! org>
Date:       2015-08-06 7:35:07
Message-ID: CALaySJLG+EHpEqGZcDM7dTOKsoXYYGoi1zNtvxVNUF_eXBQC8A () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


Thanks, Terry, and I'm OK with that answer.

Barry

On Wednesday, August 5, 2015, Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>
wrote:

> Terry Manderson has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-address-generation-privacy-07: Yes
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-address-generation-privacy/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Well constructed document - Thanks!
>
> No action for the authors or shepherd here: so in answer to Barry's
> question. I think this document is able to stand on its own feet as
> informational - it doesn't need (in my opinion) to be classified as a BCP
> to add gravitas. The approach in the document stands as informational but
> the clear language and coverage of mechanisms and the resulting tradeoffs
> provide its own weight.
>
>
>

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

Thanks, Terry, and I&#39;m OK with that \
answer.<div><br></div><div>Barry<span></span><br><br>On Wednesday, August 5, 2015, \
Terry Manderson &lt;<a \
href="mailto:terry.manderson@icann.org">terry.manderson@icann.org</a>&gt; \
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px \
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Terry Manderson has entered the following ballot \
                position for<br>
draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-address-generation-privacy-07: Yes<br>
<br>
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all<br>
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this<br>
introductory paragraph, however.)<br>
<br>
<br>
Please refer to <a href="https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html" \
target="_blank">https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html</a><br> for \
more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.<br> <br>
<br>
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:<br>
<a href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-address-generation-privacy/" \
target="_blank">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-address-generation-privacy/</a><br>
 <br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
COMMENT:<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Well constructed document - Thanks!<br>
<br>
No action for the authors or shepherd here: so in answer to Barry&#39;s<br>
question. I think this document is able to stand on its own feet as<br>
informational - it doesn&#39;t need (in my opinion) to be classified as a BCP<br>
to add gravitas. The approach in the document stands as informational but<br>
the clear language and coverage of mechanisms and the resulting tradeoffs<br>
provide its own weight.<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>



--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]