[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ipng
Subject:    Re: I-D Action: draft-imadali-its-vinipv6-viid-00.txt
From:       Tim Chown <tjc () ecs ! soton ! ac ! uk>
Date:       2013-05-20 13:56:05
Message-ID: EMEW3|b1e2c664daa3c970f0d7c78843e5d27cp4JEu703tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|A30B80F6-8344-49FF-82E5-2DD38D2C1468 () ecs ! soton ! ac ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]

On 5 Apr 2013, at 16:55, Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

> I wonder whether homenet people consider that the prefix to be delivered
> to a homenet could be longer than /64 (i.e. /65 or /66).

That would be considered a failure mode.

See 3.4.1 of the current homenet arch text (a new version of which is about to be posted).

Tim
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]