[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ipng
Subject:    FW: [pim] Comment on draft-lts-pim-hello-mtu?
From:       Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting () huawei ! com>
Date:       2012-04-09 18:06:32
Message-ID: C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A80C95D0B4 () szxeml526-mbx ! china ! huawei ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

> For IPv6 one could perhaps use RAs?

Tina


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stig Venaas [mailto:stig@venaas.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 11:02 AM
> To: Tina TSOU
> Cc: pim@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [pim] Comment on draft-lts-pim-hello-mtu?
> 
> On 4/5/2012 1:44 PM, Tina TSOU wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > May the author of draft-lts-pim-hello-mtu ask people to read the
> draft and provide comments?
> >
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lts-pim-hello-mtu/
> >
> > Thank you in advance.
> 
> See the minutes I just posted if you like.
> 
> My main comment is that MTU is important for other protocols too, and
> also for traffic/data, so I'm wondering if it would be better to do it
> with some more general protocol. Maybe BFD or in the IGP?
> For IPv6 one could perhaps use RAs?
> 
> Stig
> 
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Tina TSOU
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pim mailing list
> > pim@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]