[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ipng
Subject:    Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-07.txt>
From:       Thomas Narten <narten () us ! ibm ! com>
Date:       2011-01-17 19:32:30
Message-ID: 201101171932.p0HJWU58003756 () cichlid ! raleigh ! ibm ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

6man:

The LC on this document supposedly ended on Jan 6, but it's pretty
obvious that there haven't been enough reviews yet to convince me that
the document has received sufficient review to move forward.

Now that we're past the holiday seasons,  how about a few more
reviews?

Thanks!

Thomas

> All,

> This message starts a 6MAN Working Group Last Call on advancing:

> 	Title           : IPv6 Node Requirements RFC 4294-bis
> 	Author(s)       : E. Jankiewicz, et al.
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-07.txt
> 	Pages           : 26
> 	Date            : 2010-12-16
> 	
>         http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-07

> as an Informational RFC.  Substantive comments and statements of
>  support for advancing this document should be directed to the
>  mailing list.  Editorial suggestions can be sent to the authors.
>  This last call will end on January 6, 2011.

> Note, while not indicated in the draft the intent for this document
>  is to obsolete RFC4294. The next version will show this more
>  clearly.

> Regards,
> Bob Hinden & Brian Haberman
> 6MAN Chairs

> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]