[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ipng
Subject:    Re: agree on step one - Re:
From:       james woodyatt <jhw () apple ! com>
Date:       2007-06-28 23:54:21
Message-ID: 178DD1AD-C053-4EF8-A9C5-F2F30DC27CC1 () apple ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Jun 28, 2007, at 14:30, Roger Jorgensen wrote:
>
> about part one - both the RIR and LIR field can be set to zero's  
> for direct assignment, for other they can go through RIR.

That's not how I read Mr. Vixie's proposed text.  If both RIR and LIR  
are zero, that implies a ULA prefix that IANA reserves for its own  
operations.  Any sites that want ULA-C prefixes without going to a  
RIR need to get one from a LIR explicitly numbered by IANA.  I don't  
think we've established any policy for how IANA is expected to assign  
LIR numbers for use when RIR=0.


--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, communications engineering



--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]