[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: ipng
Subject: [M/O document] RA Absence as special case.
From: "S. Daniel Park" <soohong.park () samsung ! com>
Date: 2004-08-30 11:03:52
Message-ID: EDELKJDGPGNIPOAOHMNPEEFMGDAA.soohong.park () samsung ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi all
In case of absence of default router, we have simply added
below text to clarify this case. Now I'd like to get a feedback
and comment on this proposal, and further take a consensus.
Let us know your view on this...:-)
Suggestion 1:
==================
RA Absence
We can imagine that if no RA is available. Originally, [RFC2462]
made a rule of "invoke the stateful protocol if there is no router".
In this sense, it should be considered as a special case of RA with
the M/O flag. In addition, in the absence of a router,
[I-D.ietf-ipv6-node-requirements], said those IPv6 nodes that use
DHCP for address assignment MUST initiate DHCP to obtain IPv6
addresses and other configuration information.
If no RA appears, a node MUST initiate DHCPv6 service as
[RFC3315] to get both address and configuration information
regardless of M/O-Policy. The specific method of how a node
recognize RA absence is out of scope of this document.
==================
OR
Suggestion 2:
==================
RA Absence
We can imagine that if no RA is available. Originally, [RFC2462]
made a rule of "invoke the stateful protocol if there is no router".
In this sense, it should be considered as a special case of RA with
the M/O flag. In addition, in the absence of a router,
[I-D.ietf-ipv6-node-requirements], said those IPv6 nodes that use
DHCP for address assignment MUST initiate DHCP to obtain IPv6
addresses and other configuration information.
If no RA appears, a node MUST behave as if it receives an RA
with the M flag is ON and the O flag is OFF according to its
policy values. The specific method of how a node recognize RA
absence is out of scope of this document.
==================
Thanks in advance.
- Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
- Mobile Platform Lab. Samsung Electronics.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic