[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ipng
Subject:    Re: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags)
From:       JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= <jinmei () kame ! net>
Date:       2004-04-30 1:45:36
Message-ID: y7v3c6m6xxb.wl () ocean ! jinmei ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

>>>>> On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 11:09:18 -0400, 
>>>>> "Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com> said:

> 3315 supports both m and o.  just a fact.  that I know.

I'm not really sure about the intention of the above statement, but I
guess you made your opinion (fact?) for the following point.

>> - which protocol should be used for the O flag

(If not, please clarify the real intention.)

					JINMEI, Tatuya
					Communication Platform Lab.
					Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
					jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]