[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ipfilter
Subject:    Re: PFil 2.1.10 can not load on Solaris 8
From:       Laurent Blume <laurent () elanor ! org>
Date:       2006-06-14 11:31:17
Message-ID: 448FF385.9020404 () elanor ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Darren Reed wrote:
> ndd /dev/pfil qif_status

Okaaaay, I'll let you interpret that one :-)

# ndd /dev/pfil qif_status
ifname ill q OTHERQ ipmp num sap hl nr nw bad copy copyfail drop notip
nodata notdata
QIF1 0x0 0xd3bdabd8 0xd3bdac5c 0x0 1 806 0 11739 600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
e1000g0 0xd304679c 0xd3bda480 0xd3bda504 0x0 0 800 14 88803665 85763793
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

> Any chance the above numbers would match the problems your users
> are seeing in terms of quantity?

Hmmm, it looks possible, yes.
What does "lost" mean in that context, though? What's going on there? Is
it losing track of its states?

> How should these maximum hits be reported?
> 
> They are causing a lot of people problems, so it isn't obvious enough...

I'm not following you there, what do you mean? What are those "maximum
hits" exactly?

Thanks for your answer!

Laurent
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]