[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       inn-workers
Subject:    Re: HDR and OVER
From:       Russ Allbery <rra () stanford ! edu>
Date:       2008-08-23 17:28:28
Message-ID: 87bpzjzlmr.fsf () windlord ! stanford ! edu
[Download RAW message or body]

Julien ÉLIE <julien@trigofacile.com> writes:

> Well, they are not exactly the same...
> So I believe we will have the four commands XHDR, XOVER, HDR and OVER.
> Unless XOVER and XHDR are changed to do the same as OVER and HDR (?)

Ah, search for HDR and OVER in doc/compliance-nntp.  I think those are the
problems (there may be more).

> But how can XHDR and XOVER be advertised since they are not official
> CAPABILITIES?

They don't need to be.  They're legacy commands that shouldn't be used by
something that understands CAPABILITIES, once we advertise the standard
commands.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

    Please send questions to the list rather than mailing me directly.
     <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html> explains why.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]