[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ingo
Subject:    [ingo] Ingo vs Sam
From:       "Gary C. New" <garycnew () yahoo ! com>
Date:       2003-04-19 19:19:26
[Download RAW message or body]

I'm trying to decide which spam filtering agent would
be more appropriate for my full ldap + horde + imp +
turba implementation.  It sounds like sam was more
intended for this function, but ingo seems to be able
to preform some of the same filtering needs.

Is ingo or sam more appropriate for spam filtering?

Is ingo capable of using ldap as the primary backend? 
If no, does it intend to provide this feature in the
future?

Respectfully,


Gary

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
http://search.yahoo.com

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]