[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       inet-access
Subject:    RE: Windows 2000 behind NAT
From:       Marc Papouchado <webmaster () remarcable ! com>
Date:       2001-03-31 0:07:15
[Download RAW message or body]

That guy must be a MSCE.....

I've been running win2k servers and clients (professional) behind dialup
NAT and now Bellsuck DSL connections with no problems.  I really don't
understand these people.

-marc

 * -----Original Message-----
 * From: Larry Labas [mailto:llabas@vitria.com]
 * Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 2:51 PM
 * To: 'list@inet-access.net'
 * Subject: RE: Windows 2000 behind NAT
 *
 *
 * Hello.
 *
 * >From my experience at home using Win2K, my PacBell DSL (PPPOE) and the RRAS
 * you do not have to use the internal DNS server in  Win2k.
 *
 * If you implement Active Directory then you need an Internal DNS which should
 * be Active Directory integrated.
 *
 * However, if you do not run one and use the NAT in the RRAS then you need to
 * set the client's to use and External DNS.
 *
 * Also, the easiest method for the RRAS (again I learned this by doing it at
 * home :) is to have it assign your DHCP services and not use the DHCP
 * service.  There's an option for the NAT to provide the addresses.
 *
 * What I did was use the DHCP manager to setup the RRAS DHCP options and
 * disabled the DHCP service.
 *
 * TTFN
 * Larry
 *
 * -----Original Message-----
 * From: Tim Hodges,Triangle Telephone Cooperative Assoc.
 * [mailto:ttceng@ttc-cmc.net]
 * Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 2:33 PM
 * To: list@inet-access.net
 * Subject: Windows 2000 behind NAT
 *
 *
 * I just had a conversation with a local computer consultant for
 * a small public library. We are going to provide them DSL service
 * using Efficient Network 5260 router. We are going to be running
 * NAT. This "expert" claimed that both Novell and Windows 2000 will
 * not work behind a NAT because the Win2000 server "has to" run it
 * own interal DNS that won't work behind a NAT. To me that whole thing
 * sounds fishy, but I wondered if anyone else has run into problems
 * in this configuration..
 *
 *
 * Tim
 * =====================================================================
 * Tim Hodges                                           Tel 800.332.1201
 * Advanced Services Supervisor                         Fax 406.394.7801
 * Triangle Telephone/Central Montana Communications  ttceng@ttc-cmc.net
 *
 *    "Where wisdom is called for, force is of little use" -- Unknown
 *
 * =====================================================================
 * -
 * List archives can be found at: <http://www.moongroup.com/inet.php>
 * Send 'unsubscribe' in the body to 'list-request@inet-access.net' to leave.
 * Eat sushi frequently.   inet@inet-access.net is the human contact address.
 * -
 * List archives can be found at: <http://www.moongroup.com/inet.php>
 * Send 'unsubscribe' in the body to 'list-request@inet-access.net' to leave.
 * Eat sushi frequently.   inet@inet-access.net is the human contact address.
 * -
 * List archives can be found at: <http://www.moongroup.com/inet.php>
 * Send 'unsubscribe' in the body to 'list-request@inet-access.net' to leave.
 * Eat sushi frequently.   inet@inet-access.net is the human contact address.

-
List archives can be found at: <http://www.moongroup.com/inet.php>
Send 'unsubscribe' in the body to 'list-request@inet-access.net' to leave.
Eat sushi frequently.   inet@inet-access.net is the human contact address.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]