[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       inet-access
Subject:    RE: Cisco 1720 config question (was: troubleshooting tools)
From:       "Jason M. Taylor" <jtaylor () precisioncs ! net>
Date:       2000-06-30 20:56:05
[Download RAW message or body]

Here is a snippet from the 'sh ip nat translations' output:

tcp 206.137.188.37:2980 10.0.0.37:2980    207.188.7.131:80
207.188.7.131:80
tcp 206.137.188.37:1718 10.0.0.2:1720     205.209.16.6:80    205.209.16.6:80
tcp 206.137.188.37:3715 10.0.0.44:3715    209.109.145.137:8080
209.109.145.137:8080
tcp 206.137.188.37:1557 10.0.0.38:1557    216.40.128.129:80
216.40.128.129:80
tcp 206.137.188.37:1538 10.0.0.38:1538    216.40.128.129:80
216.40.128.129:80
tcp 206.137.188.37:1878 10.0.0.37:1878    207.188.7.131:80
207.188.7.131:80
tcp 206.137.188.37:3307 10.0.0.44:3307    199.93.4.211:80    199.93.4.211:80
tcp 206.137.188.37:3056 10.0.0.44:3056    207.172.3.123:80
207.172.3.123:80
tcp 206.137.188.37:3331 10.0.0.38:3331    207.46.189.13:80
207.46.189.13:80
tcp 206.137.188.37:3053 10.0.0.44:3053    207.172.3.80:80    207.172.3.80:80
tcp 206.137.188.37:1120 10.0.0.21:1120    192.156.136.22:80
192.156.136.22:80
tcp 206.137.188.37:1124 10.0.0.35:1124    207.46.150.205:80
207.46.150.205:80

Everything there looks fine to me...

here is the output from 'sh mem free'

             Head   Total(b)    Used(b)    Free(b)  Lowest(b) Largest(b)
Processor  8075E548    7373496    2114124    5259372    5107716    5212900
      I/O    E66800    1677312    1442616     234696     107072      91156

Looks to me like enough RAM?

Thanks again..

-Jason




> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-list@inet-access.net [mailto:owner-list@inet-access.net]On
> Behalf Of Brian
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 4:52 PM
> To: list@inet-access.net
> Subject: RE: Cisco 1720 config question (was: troubleshooting tools)
>
>
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Jason M. Taylor wrote:
>
> > questions to your response:
> >
> > 1. so it would be safe then to eliminate the 'bandwidth
> 384' since the T1
> > WIC will handle the time-slot/bandwidth config?
>
> Yes, but you can leave it, its not hurting anything, I just
> wanted you to
> realize that having it in there isn't doing anything.
>
> > 2. since the T1 terminates into an IRX would it matter if I
> remove the 'no
> > cdp enable' from the Ethernet interface?
>
> If you have no other cisco devices on the lan then you can disable
> it.........but doesn't matter.  On serial interfaces alot of people
> disable it for links that aren't connected to Cisco equipment
> to reduce
> the chatter on the links.
>
> You can look at "sh ip nat translations" when you have
> someone who can't
> get to a site.  Make sure all of that looks good.
>
> Also make sure the router isn't getting low on memory,
> translation tables
> can take up a good amount of memory if you have alot of clients.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Brian Feeny (BF304)     signal@shreve.net
> 318-222-2638 x 109	http://www.shreve.net/~signal
> Network Administrator   ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
>
> -
> Send 'unsubscribe' in the body to
> 'list-request@inet-access.net' to leave.
> Eat sushi frequently.   inet@inet-access.net is the human
> contact address.
>


-
Send 'unsubscribe' in the body to 'list-request@inet-access.net' to leave.
Eat sushi frequently.   inet@inet-access.net is the human contact address.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]