[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       imap
Subject:    Re: [Imap-protocol] STARTTLS after PREAUTH
From:       Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov () isode ! com>
Date:       2014-03-19 23:30:23
Message-ID: 72EE9E09-248C-4AE1-A80F-CD1A6A74B601 () isode ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Michael,

> On 19 Mar 2014, at 18:59, Michael M Slusarz <slusarz@curecanti.org> wrote:
> 
> Quoting Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>:
> 
> > Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014, at 08:25 AM, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > STARTTLS deprecated the use of port 993, which isn't an official IMAP
> > > > port FWIW.
> > 
> > What do you mean by "official"? Have you seen RFC 6186?
> 
> Nothing in there registering 993 to IMAP.  RFC 6335 registry agrees that it hasn't \
> been "officially" reserved: 
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml?search=imaps
>  
> But this is just arguing semantics.  Real-world: 993 (& 995) have universal \
> knowledge as to their current use.

I think IETF UTA WG is going to register them properly.

> michael
> A
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Imap-protocol mailing list
> Imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
> http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol
_______________________________________________
Imap-protocol mailing list
Imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]