[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       imap
Subject:    Re: [Imap-protocol] Combining LITERAL+ and BINARY
From:       Timo Sirainen <tss () iki ! fi>
Date:       2012-11-28 0:41:14
Message-ID: 89092201-3988-4783-9888-99A5D34B2569 () iki ! fi
[Download RAW message or body]

On 28.11.2012, at 1.59, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:

> On 2012-11-27, at 3:35 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> 
> > It's not defined, so I don't think clients can legally use their
> > combination.. Although Dovecot supports the obvious way of combining
> > them: ~{n+}
> 
> And I consider that a legitimate operation.
> 
> I'm planning to push an updated BINARY RFC, and I'll make sure this case is called \
> out.

Nice. I noticed several other ambiguous issues when I implemented it a few months \
ago. I think I sent a mail about all of them to the IMAP mailing lists..

_______________________________________________
Imap-protocol mailing list
Imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]