[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       imap
Subject:    Re: New flag extensions?
From:       Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt () gulbrandsen ! priv ! no>
Date:       2004-01-03 22:05:17
Message-ID: 2lgEJI+h4tFgClvcLDxqHQ.md5 () prosecco ! oryx ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

David Harris writes:
> Clearly "\HasChildren" and "\HasNoChildren" are flag extensions, and 
> hence must be covered by either an RFC or a standards-track document 
> that revises RFC3501 itself (see RFC3501 page 85). Could someone 
> please point me at that RFC or standards-track document?

RFC 3348 IIRC.

--Arnt
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]