[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ilug
Subject:    Re: [ILUG] BSD vs GPL licenses
From:       paul () clubi ! ie
Date:       2011-04-06 12:17:44
Message-ID: alpine.LFD.2.02.1104061312520.13073 () jamaica ! dcs ! gla ! ac ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, David Pintor wrote:

> Any thoughts appreciated.

The right licence depends on the goals of the licensor.

E.g. if they're aiming for universal adoption of some reference code, 
then perhaps BSD or LGPL is the right answer.

If they're concerned that the code should remain free, even as its 
extended, then the GPL is probably the better answer.

If they want to make money on the side by charging for licences for 
proprietary, commercial use, then the BSD definitely doesn't do. 
You'd want the GPL (specifically, the most restrictive form of it - 
GPLv3).

However, many licensors pick BSD or GPL simply according to which 
crowd they tend to hang with.

regards,
-- 
Paul Jakma  paul@jakma.org  twitter: @pjakma  PGP: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
The system was down for backups from 5am to 10am last Saturday.
-- 
Irish Linux Users' Group mailing list
About this list : http://mail.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug
Who we are : http://www.linux.ie/
Where we are : http://www.linux.ie/map/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic