[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ietf-tls
Subject:    Re: [TLS] consensus call: changing cTLS and ECH to standards track
From:       Sean Turner <sean () sn3rd ! com>
Date:       2020-06-27 0:28:20
Message-ID: 7AC6C26C-3946-4039-89D9-F6742D93C122 () sn3rd ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

We are going to close these out and request that the authors change the track on \
these drafts to standards track. There are multiple participants who expressed a \
willingness to implement.

I will note that Rich is a bit skeptical, and I can add that to the Shepherd \
write-up.

spt

> On May 21, 2020, at 22:10, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> 
> It looks like the intended status for both draft-ietf-tls-ctls (aka cTLS) and \
> draft-ietf-tls-esni (aka ECH) should be changed. It appears that both should be set \
> to standards track; cTLS is now Informational and ECH is Experimental. If you \
> object to changing the track for either of these drafts please send an email to the \
> list stating why by 2359 UTC on 5 June 2020. 
> Cheers,
> spt (for the Chairs)

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]