[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ietf-tls
Subject:    Re: [TLS] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-tls13-vectors-06: (with COMMENT)
From:       Adam Roach <adam () nostrum ! com>
Date:       2018-07-30 23:21:51
Message-ID: 07cac7dd-d518-87d9-a94a-7bd1ec2b0ef3 () nostrum ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 7/30/18 6:13 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 8:33 AM Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> > This doesn't parse. Probably should say "...through the use of labels..." or
> > something similar.
> > [...]
> > I'm not sure what to make of this. Should it say "...private RSA keys for this
> > example..." or something like that? It may also be useful to include a sentence
> > or clause explaining why the omitted private key is not useful for users of this
> > document.
> The private keys for certificates weren't included (as you noticed,
> the key exchange keys are).
> 
> Both fixed in https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-tls13-vectors/commit/ca4896c7a3b3cc6d214a1e6fe94b64ba1b1230e8
> 


Thanks!

/a


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]