[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ietf
Subject:    Re: Universal Network Language
From:       Jon Knight <J.P.Knight () lboro ! ac ! uk>
Date:       2000-05-23 14:52:42
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, 23 May 2000, Jean-Paul Jeral wrote:
> (1) 
> http://www.unl.ias.unu.edu/publications/gm/breaking/bre/brk-02.htm
> states that:
> 
>  `UNL represents sentences in the form of 
> logical expressions, without ambiguity.
> These expressions are not for humans to 
> read, but for computers.'

So is this a machine readable version of an Esperanto style human language
or something more like ANDF/UNCOL?

Tatty bye,

Jim'll

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]