[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ietf
Subject:    Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: I want to reclaim 192.88.99.0/24 - does anyone have a problem with that?
From:       Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar ! org>
Date:       2021-08-12 17:08:35
Message-ID: e8bea8e8-b64b-e405-6da4-731d6d3ad9e1 () foobar ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Templin (US), Fred L wrote on 12/08/2021 18:00:
> I think given the
> points that I related to Nick and Dale above, however, it would seem that any
> potential conflicts would be avoided?

in general, special purpose address blocks are assigned by IANA. There's 
nothing in the draft that requires 192.88.99.0/24, and given that it's 
still visible to some degree in the dfz it would probably be advisable 
to avoid using it.  Do you have a specific reason why 192.88.99.0/24 
would work where another range wouldn't?

Nick

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic