[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: ietf
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: I want to reclaim 192.88.99.0/24 - does anyone have a problem with that?
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar ! org>
Date: 2021-08-12 17:08:35
Message-ID: e8bea8e8-b64b-e405-6da4-731d6d3ad9e1 () foobar ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
Templin (US), Fred L wrote on 12/08/2021 18:00:
> I think given the
> points that I related to Nick and Dale above, however, it would seem that any
> potential conflicts would be avoided?
in general, special purpose address blocks are assigned by IANA. There's
nothing in the draft that requires 192.88.99.0/24, and given that it's
still visible to some degree in the dfz it would probably be advisable
to avoid using it. Do you have a specific reason why 192.88.99.0/24
would work where another range wouldn't?
Nick
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic