[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ietf
Subject:    RE: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08
From:       Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar () huawei ! com>
Date:       2017-10-25 21:53:34
Message-ID: 4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66AFC5561 () sjceml521-mbs ! china ! huawei ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Carlos, 

Thank you very much for reviewing the draft. 

Reply to your comment is inserted below:

-----Original Message-----
From: Carlos Martinez [mailto:carlosm3011@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 8:56 PM
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework.all@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08

Reviewer: Carlos Martinez
Review result: Ready

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort \
to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were \
written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. \
Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the \
IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like \
any other last call comments.

Overall I've found this document to be READY. I do believe that some parts'
readability could be improved however, particularly Section 5. This section describes \
some principles a potential implementation of the spec should follow but provides \
little or no justification for them. I believe additional text could help. [Linda] \
This section is to give the guideline to other drafts (to be developed by the WG). \
The justification for those guideline was covered by the charter, e.g.  Focusing on \
the flow based NSFs.  Another goal is to allow support for vendor specific functions. \


Linda

Thank you to the authors for their great work!

Carlos


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]