[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ietf
Subject:    Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
From:       Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic ! fr>
Date:       2017-09-30 9:48:30
Message-ID: 20170930094830.eqzyj2rjqvg3nted () sources ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:17:24PM +0100,
 Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrote 
 a message of 60 lines which said:

> A lot of the world still relies heavily on IPv4, and many countries
> would rightly regard IPv4 as critical national infrastructure.

So what? The draft never says "IPv4 MUST be shutdown tomorrow".

> If the IETF announces that it is no longer supporting IPv4,

The draft says nothing like that, quite the opposite.

I think the discussion derailed from an actual draft to a fight
against a strawman.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]