[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ietf
Subject:    Re: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal.
From:       Alexa Morris <amorris () amsl ! com>
Date:       2017-05-26 15:03:17
Message-ID: 313AD8B1-7D69-4C8C-A750-97004D26BE34 () amsl ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Khaled,

The IESG has reviewed your request and the drafts will not be removed. Their response \
directly below:

---------
Alexa,

The drafts should not be removed. The IESG has not identified any unusual \
circumstances (e.g., mistaken claims of authorship or allegations of draft content \
violating the law) that warrant removal of these drafts.

Regards,
The IESG

--------
On May 22, 2017, at 5:54 PM, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com> wrote:

> As mentioned in the provided link:
> 
> "Internet-Drafts have no formal status, and are subject to change or removal at any \
> time." 
> > which explains that IESG consensus is required in order to remove an Internet \
> > Draft from the I-D Repository.
> 
> From today's date till reaching this consensus for removal, these IDs shouldn't be \
> discussed or published by the ietf on any meeting or any official event as the \
> contents are not representing the ietf anymore after this date. 
> I'm waiting for the IESG response ... I hope they can make a decision soon.
> 
> "When an I-D is removed from the Public I-D Archive, a copy will be kept in a \
> location accessible by the IETF Secretariat." 
> This of course doesn't gives the ietf the right of making any usage of these I-Ds \
> after its removal. 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexa Morris [mailto:amorris@amsl.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 2:27 AM
> To: Khaled Omar
> Cc: Ole J. Jacobsen; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal.
> 
> Khaled,
> 
> The IESG has published a statement on this topic. Please see "IESG Statement on \
> Removal of an Internet-Draft from the IETF Web Site" at \
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/removal-of-an-internet-draft.html, which \
> explains that IESG consensus is required in order to remove an Internet Draft from \
> the I-D Repository. 
> I have forwarded your email to the IESG for their review. Please be patient as it \
> will take at least several days for them to review and respond to this request.  
> Regards,
> Alexa
> 
> On May 22, 2017, at 7:09 PM, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > I'm the only author of the listed IDs and they are submitted individually, I made \
> > this removal request and these IDs must not be stored on the ietf database \
> > anymore and the ietf representation must not exist after the request date and \
> > time which is 23rd of May, 2017 at 1:00 PM GMT+02:00. 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ole Jacobsen [mailto:olejacobsen@me.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 1:02 AM
> > To: Khaled Omar
> > Subject: Re: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal.
> > 
> > 
> > You really have no idea how the IETF works, do you?
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, 22 May 2017, Khaled Omar wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Jasmine,
> > > 
> > > As I'm the only author of the following IDs:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 1) Internet Protocol version 10 (IPv10): 
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-ipv10/
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 2) KHALED Routing Protocol (KRP): 
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-krp/
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 3) Regional Routing Protocol (RRP): 
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-rrp/
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Please remove them all from the ietf database or repository.
> > > 
> > > If the ideas explained on these drafts will be used, discussed or 
> > > published by the ietf, legal actions will be taken.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > > Khaled Omar
> > > 
> > 
> 
> ----------
> Alexa Morris / Executive Director / IETF
> +1.510.492.4001
> Email: amorris@amsl.com
> 
> 
> 

----------
Alexa Morris / Executive Director / IETF
+1.510.492.4001
Email: amorris@amsl.com


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]