[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ietf
Subject:    CIRI Human Rights Data Project
From:       "David Benham (dbenham)" <dbenham () cisco ! com>
Date:       2016-05-26 21:19:24
Message-ID: 7085c5948c544338a3559b5a27551316 () XCH-RCD-020 ! cisco ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Food for thought; instead of trying make a statement against certain states or \
country, what about only/mostly patronizing those countries that are setting the \
high-bar for human rights via their *actions* (vs laws too often ignored) spanning a \
comprehensive set of criteria, including all that extrajudicial activity \
(incarceration, torture, etc)?


For example, the Human Rights Data Project contains standards-based quantitative \
information on government practices for a wide range of internationally-recognized \
human rights, primarily drawing from the US Department of State and Amnesty \
International reports.

http://www.humanrightsdata.com/p/faq.html
http://www.humanrightsdata.com/p/data-documentation.html

THE BEST & WORST OF 2010
http://www.humanrightsdata.com/2011/12/human-rights-in-2010-ciri-report.html
All 14 of CIRI's individual indicators of particular human rights can be summed into \
an overall human rights score.  The best score a country can receive is 30.

Top 13 Countries:
Denmark [30]
Iceland [30]
Austria [29]
New Zealand [29]
Norway [29]
Australia [28]
Belgium [28]
Finland [28]
Liechtenstein [28]
Luxembourg [28]
Netherlands [28]
San Marino [28]
Sweden [28]


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]