[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ietf
Subject:    Re: SPAM: - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs-05.txt> (Updated TLS Server Identity Chec
From:       Samir Srivastava <samirs.lists () gmail ! com>
Date:       2015-11-22 1:34:21
Message-ID: CAK+Spiwi8AnWuGQ=51fbF+8W8bonr6oz5vuKTHLewz_Fw=fDNA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi,

  Due to involvement of powerful influential persons, I was left with
no other option to post the matter which was not relevant. I wanted
the people to know that I am in trouble, United Nations Human Right
Council, Supreme Court did not listen to me. Can we have discussion on
Security Avoidance draft of the dispatch group?

  Do you want to discuss how we can make protocol as a science?

Thanks
Samir Srivastava

On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 7:24 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
<jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:
> Dear Samir, all,
> 
> Speaking as sergeant-at-arms.
> 
> I think this topic and the attachment is out of scope for the IETF exploder.
> 
> You're also behaving with attacks to other participants, which can't be tolerated.
> 
> Furthermore, I don't think crossposting to this list for a technical discussion is \
> appropriate. 
> So please don't keep going on, read RFC3005, and avoid even responding to this \
> email, so I don't need to restrict your posting rights. 
> Regards,
> Jordi
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de Samir Srivastava \
> <samirs.lists@gmail.com> Responder a: <samirs.lists@gmail.com>
> Fecha: sábado, 21 de noviembre de 2015, 15:12
> Para: ComKal Networks <admin@comkal.com.au>
> CC: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
> Asunto: Re: SPAM: - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs-05.txt> (Updated \
> TLS Server Identity Check Procedure for Email Related Protocols) to Proposed \
> Standard 
> > This is not an spam. I am forwading the attachment to you. In which
> > supreme court of US did not do anything
> > 
> > On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 9:05 AM, ComKal Networks <admin@comkal.com.au> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 18:26:57 -0500 Samir Srivastava wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Sorry I donot have time to change the subject. Can Protocol become
> > > 
> > > Have the courtesy to at least place SPAM: at the start of
> > > your subject line please.
> > > 
> > > 
> 
> 


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]