[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ietf
Subject:    Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-yusef-dispatch-ccmp-indication-04
From:       Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.ietf () gmail ! com>
Date:       2013-09-25 22:42:34
Message-ID: CAGL6epKt_mD87VMR+zO7i6n8sfuTOjCAKQ1KCxRjYY58wSW_FQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

We have just submitted a new version (v05) that addresses all the comment
we received so far.
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-yusef-dispatch-ccmp-indication-05.txt

Please, let us know if you have any further comments.

Regards,
 Rifaat


On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:

> Hi Mary,
>
> I similarly apologize for the delay in responding. It's been a busy week.
>
> As I started to go over your responses one by one, I realized I had
> notated each one as WFM. So rather than send all that, I will summarize as
> "I agree with all of your responses, and updates to these effects will
> resolve all of my concerns."
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ben.
>
> On Sep 16, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > I apologize for the delay in responding.  I had initially missed this
> review - it either got cached directly with gen-art reviews or the tools
> alias burped.  I'm not on the main IETF list with this email address.
> >
> > Anyways, thank you very much for your thorough review.  Our responses
> are below [MB].
> >
> > We have an update underway that addresses your's and other's LC
> comments.  We can forward that to you to preview if you would like.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mary.
>
> [...]

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr">We have just submitted a new version (v05) that addresses all the \
comment we received so far.<div><a \
href="http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-yusef-dispatch-ccmp-indication-05.txt">http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-yusef-dispatch-ccmp-indication-05.txt</a><br>
 </div><div><br></div><div>Please, let us know if you have any further \
comments.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div> Rifaat</div></div><div \
class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:38 PM, \
Ben Campbell <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:ben@nostrum.com" \
target="_blank">ben@nostrum.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br> <blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Mary,<br> <br>
I similarly apologize for the delay in responding. It&#39;s been a busy week.<br>
<br>
As I started to go over your responses one by one, I realized I had notated each one \
as WFM. So rather than send all that, I will summarize as &quot;I agree with all of \
your responses, and updates to these effects will resolve all of my \
concerns.&quot;<br>

<br>
Thanks!<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Ben.<br>
</font></span><div class="im"><br>
On Sep 16, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Mary Barnes &lt;<a \
href="mailto:mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com">mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com</a>&gt; \
wrote:<br> <br>
&gt; Hi Ben,<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I apologize for the delay in responding.  I had initially missed this review - \
it either got cached directly with gen-art reviews or the tools alias burped.  \
I&#39;m not on the main IETF list with this email address.<br>

&gt;<br>
&gt; Anyways, thank you very much for your thorough review.  Our responses are below \
[MB].<br> &gt;<br>
&gt; We have an update underway that addresses your&#39;s and other&#39;s LC \
comments.  We can forward that to you to preview if you would like.<br> &gt;<br>
&gt; Regards,<br>
&gt; Mary.<br>
<br>
</div>[...]</blockquote></div><br></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]