[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ietf
Subject:    Re: DRAFT-IETF-GEOPRIV-RADIUS-LO-23
From:       todd glassey <tglassey () certichron ! com>
Date:       2013-09-25 13:23:41
Message-ID: 5242E3DD.3080404 () certichron ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 04/08/2009 12:12 PM, Anthony Leibovitz wrote:
> 
> 
> As an example, Section 1 states that "location information needs to
> be protected against unauthorized access and distribution", yet
> nowhere in the document are the implications of this statement for
> the RADIUS protocol laid out. D
> 
Anthony - so what - this is the IETF and there is nothing here mandating 
that any protocol work with another.

If GeoPriv breaks RADIUS that is grounds for more standards work right ???

Nice...

Todd Glassey

-- 
Warning: This message contains information which may be confidential and/or \
privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the \
intended recipient), you may not read, use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or \
any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, \
please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) \
thereto without retaining any copies.


[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 04/08/2009 12:12 PM, Anthony
      Leibovitz wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:180B3E3BF11C4B4581E20A837620FAF0177003C5E4@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com"
  type="cite">
      <h1 style="margin-left:.5in;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1
        lfo2"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;font-weight:normal">
  As an example, Section 1 states that
          &#8220;location information needs to be protected against
          unauthorized access and
          distribution&#8221;, yet nowhere in the document are the
          implications of this
          statement for the RADIUS protocol laid out.&nbsp;D</span></h1>
    </blockquote>
    Anthony - so what - this is the IETF and there is nothing here
    mandating that any protocol work with another. <br>
    <br>
    If GeoPriv breaks RADIUS that is grounds for more standards work
    right ??? <br>
    <br>
    Nice... <br>
    <br>
    Todd Glassey<br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Warning: This message contains information which may be confidential and/or \
privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the \
intended recipient), you may not read, use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or \
any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, \
please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) \
thereto without retaining any copies.</pre>  </body>
</html>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic