[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ietf
Subject:    Re: secid review of draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-rh0-01
From:       Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf () mit ! edu>
Date:       2007-09-25 13:55:45
Message-ID: tslve9yg87y.fsf () mit ! edu
[Download RAW message or body]

So, BCP 61's claim that MUST is for implementers and SHOULD is for
users is always something I've interpreted as non-normative and
additional explanation of RFC 2199.  Well, I' guess it is normative in
that we do not for security reasons require that security be used.


I certainly think reviewing the musts and shoulds in this case is
fine, but if the authors believe they used the right word, then leave
the text.  If there is a problem we can clean it up during iesg
evaluation.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]