[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: ietf
Subject: Re: Process of submitting an RFC for review...
From: Bob Braden <braden () ISI ! EDU>
Date: 2002-06-26 14:24:50
[Download RAW message or body]
*> From listadm@loki.ietf.org Tue Jun 25 21:56:52 2002
*> X-Authentication-Warning: ietf.org: majordom set sender to owner-ietf@ietf.org using -f
*> Mime-Version: 1.0
*> X-Sender: resnick@resnick1.qualcomm.com (Unverified)
*> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 23:51:15 -0500
*> To: "Thomas J. Hruska" <shinelight@shininglightpro.com>
*> From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
*> Subject: Re: Process of submitting an RFC for review...
*> Cc: ietf@ietf.org
*> X-Loop: ietf@ietf.org
*> X-AntiVirus: scanned by AMaViS 0.2.1
*>
*> On 6/26/02 at 12:21 AM -0400, Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
*>
*> >My question is this: Where should I go and how do I start the
*> >process of getting an official RFC created?
*>
*> You want to take a look at RFC 3160, section 6 (which can be found in
*> nice HTML form at <http://www.ietf.org/tao.html#6>), and if you want
*> more detailed information about the process, take a look at RFC 2026,
*> starting with section 2.
*>
*> pr
*> --
*> Pete Resnick <mailto:presnick@qualcomm.com>
*> QUALCOMM Incorporated
*>
And the RFC Editor web site, www.rfc-editor.org.
RFC Editor
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic