[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       hurd-bug
Subject:    Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] On ldconfig and ld.so.cache
From:       Ludovic_Courtès <ludo () gnu ! org>
Date:       2023-05-24 14:09:06
Message-ID: 87sfbllt31.fsf () gnu ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi,

Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com> skribis:

> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 2:52 PM Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Removing configuration options and making it simple to configure and use glibc is \
> > great goal. I think that ldconfig should always be enabled and I don't see a \
> > downside to making `use_ldconfig=yes` the default, but I think we'd have to check \
> > with Guix or Nix to see if they have any custom changes there. It involves \
> > probably a slightly broader distro discussion.

I missed the beginning of the discussion and I fear I'm slightly
changing topics :-), but to me we should work toward per-application
loader caches:

  https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2021/taming-the-stat-storm-with-a-loader-cache/
  https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/patches/glibc-dl-cache.patch?id=6d0571215d661d21cac2150ca45906e77a79a5fb


This is the one custom change we have in Guix.

(And IMO it should work the same on Linux and on the Hurd.)

Ludo'.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]