[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       hurd-bug
Subject:    Re: GNUstep - check for reuse address
From:       Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault () gnu ! org>
Date:       2016-01-09 11:17:05
Message-ID: 20160109111705.GA2852 () var ! home
[Download RAW message or body]

Svante Signell, on Sat 09 Jan 2016 09:15:47 +0100, wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 00:37 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, on Fri 08 Jan 2016 21:59:56 +0100, wrote:
> > > Unlink the old socket and create a new one with the same name. (I
> > > wonder how GNU/Linux is implementing this?)
> > 
> > It doesn't.
> 
> Since it works on GNU/Linux how is it solved then?

No, it does not work.  As I said in an earlier mail, GNU/Linux returns
zero as if it was successfull, but doesn't actually do anything about. A
very odd behavior, if you ask me.

Samuel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]