[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       httpclient-users
Subject:    Re: [POLL] Logging toolkit for HttpClient 4.x
From:       Oleg Kalnichevski <olegk () apache ! org>
Date:       2008-06-11 13:44:27
Message-ID: 1213191867.11787.15.camel () ubuntu
[Download RAW message or body]

[x] migrate to java.util.logging

With solutions like JULI [1] and jul-Log4j-bridge [2] I see no reason of
what so ever for both commons logging and slf4j to exist 

Oleg

[1] http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/logging.html
[2]
http://people.apache.org/~psmith/logging.apache.org/sandbox/jul-log4j-bridge/

PS: I'll tally the votes on Friday


On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 22:36 +0200, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> We are currently considering whether we should continue using
> commons-logging or migrate to SLF4J or java.util.logging. Please let us
> what your preference is. We are going to make the final decision based
> on the results of the poll. A simple majority will _not_ automatically
> impose a particular choice but will strongly influence the decision
> making process. 
> 
> All users of HttpClient are encouraged to participate.
> 
> Oleg
> 
> -------------------
> [ ] keep Commons logging
> [ ] migrate to SLF4J
> [ ] migrate to java.util.logging
> -------------------
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-users-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-users-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-users-help@hc.apache.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]