[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       httpclient-commons-dev
Subject:    Re: [jira] Resolved: (HTTPCLIENT-921) Where can I get javadoc for
From:       sebb <sebbaz () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-02-27 13:59:01
Message-ID: 25aac9fc1002270559uc395f4ey5c433f1e3b9b5d7d () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 27/02/2010, Oleg Kalnichevski <olegk@apache.org> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> 
> > On 27/02/2010, Oleg Kalnichevski (JIRA) <jira@apache.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
>  ]
> > > 
> > > Oleg Kalnichevski resolved HTTPCLIENT-921.
> > > ------------------------------------------
> > > 
> > > Resolution: Fixed
> > > 
> > 
> > Should surely be Won't Fix?
> > 
> > 
> 
> The issue was open as a Question, so I felt FIXED was appropriate. Feel
> free to change the resolution to something else.

Ah, OK, I had not spotted that.

> 
> > But I think it's a bit unfair to penalise users for our mistake.
> > 
> > I also think it's wrong for the web-site to contain Javadocs for a the
> > wrong release.
> > 
> > 
> 
> The javadocs correspond to the latest official release which happened to be
> 4.1-alpha1. I am fine with deploying javadocs for 4.0.1 alongside
> 
> 
> 
> > At the least, I think we should generate an archive with Javadocs and
> > release that alongside the binary and source archives.
> > 
> > I'll see about starting that later.
> > 
> > 
> 
> That'd be great.
> 
> Oleg
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@hc.apache.org
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@hc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@hc.apache.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]