[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: hpux-cxx-dev
Subject: Re: CXX-DEV: DA and DS compiler switches
From: Dennis Handly <dhandly () hpcllmx ! cup ! hp ! com>
Date: 2000-05-22 21:44:58
[Download RAW message or body]
>that the +DA and +DS switches perform different actions
Yes, one says on which machines it runs, the other says how fast.
>Are these options mutually exclusive? In other words, if I compile with
>+DA and +DS, do I get a "more optimized" executable than if I just
>compile with +DA or +DS alone?
Jason Steiner
No, they are orthogonal.
You should specify both.
>From: Matthew Collins <collins@hpsgns1.sgp.hp.com>
>In the scheduling models I don't know if the compiler behaves
>differently for PA1.1a through PA1.1e (is there any difference??)
Yes, they are for the N different version of those chips.
>if +DAportable is just a synonym for 1.1.
Yes, that's all it sets, +DA.
>I don't know if there is any difference between say just specifying:
+DA2.0 +DS2.0 and +DAV2000 +DSV2000 and +DAV2500 +DSV2500
Matthew
No. Only the deprecated +tm has a difference.
_________________________________________________________________
To leave this mailing list, send mail to majordomo@cxx.cup.hp.com
with the message UNSUBSCRIBE cxx-dev
_________________________________________________________________
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic